|
Review of New Project Trends |
First published Aug 09
|
Eric Tse |
Rating |
|
|
Abstract
This
paper provides a consolidated review of near future trends in research
topics on project management from different authoritative sources.
The research is based on a literature review of several articles
in Project Management Journals from 2008 and 2009. This paper also
provides some recommendations and insights based on the review.

Introduction
Starting from the 2008/2009 time frame, the PMI/PM Journal has
been encouraging submission of white papers to extend the boundaries
of project management knowledge area and its relevant research.
Different authorities have provided different views on what they
see in the near future for project management. There are many common
areas, and yet they perceive similar things in different framework
and perspectives. Also each of the submissions has its own specialities
and forecasts a different dimension for the extension of current
project management.

Literature review
Different authorities have extended the current PM knowledge regime
into different dimensions.
Nine Schools of Project Management Research
Bredillet[1], in his article, "Exploring Research in Project Management:
Nine Schools of Project Management Research" [1], define
new project management in an abstract ways, in the forms of nine
schools of thoughts . Nine schools of thoughts:
- Governance
- Marketing
- Behaviour
- Contingency
- Success
- Optimization
- Modelling
- Decision
- Process.
"Productive research can be conducted on the interactions between
project management and related management disciplines and can explore
the relevance and impact of progress in other management disciplines
on project management, including issues related to professional
and social responsibility, ethics, and environmental and social
impact of projects.
 
The Second Dimension
The second dimesion of stretching is to broaden the PM scope from
traditional indutries to newer industries.
"Research can be conducted on how project management is affecting
other disciplines such as engineering, construction, information
technology, pharmaceuticals, marketing, and operations management." [1]
"Despite the broadening use of systematic approaches to project
management, the majority of related literature is focused on a handful
of industries-construction, engineering, government, information
technology, and utilities-that have, until recently, been the traditional
areas for project management."
Currently, the non-traditional project management areas include
banking, pharmaceuticals, consulting, advertising, legal, health
care, safety, and non-traditional manufacturing and industrial sectors
(Kerzner, 2001). In recognition of growth, scholars and practitioners
have begun to include viewpoints generalized across the field as
well as perspectives from specific industries." [2]
Research directions for non-traditional areas: [2]
(1) What is the availability of quality project management literature
in non-traditional industries?
(2) What are the themes from the project management literature
in non-traditional industries?
(3) What topics or themes from the project management literature
may be generalizable to nontraditional industries?
and
(4) What do systematically identified articles tell us about project
management in the nontraditional areas identified?

The Third Dimension
The third dimension is to intertwine project management with real/virtual
social network etc. This is like "sociology of project management."
For example the Chung and Hossian paper examines
".the effect of social network position, structure, and ties on
the performance of knowledge-intensive workers in dispersed occupational
communities. Using structural holes and strength-of-tie theory,
we develop a theoretical framework and a valid and reliable survey
instrument."
Also, they apply network and structural holes measures for understanding
its association with performance. Empirical results suggest that
degree centrality in a knowledge workers' professional network positively
influences performance use, whereas a highly constrained professional
network is detrimental to performance. The findings show that social
network structure and position are important factors to consider
for individual performance."[3]
The research provides insight on the following topics.
- How can individual performance be understood through the emergent
patterns of social processes that constitute performance?
- How can it be evaluated?
- What is the role of social influence and social networks (that
create such influence) in understanding individual performance?
- Why understanding social network structure and position are
important for understanding individual performance?
- How does one account for social factors, apart from personal
and demographic factors, that are important for enhancing individual
performance in a project environment?

The Fourth Dimension
The fourth dimension is to identify some traditional general management/non
management disciplines and see how they fit into the project management
area. This is known as the "allied discipline framework "[4].
Core questions are
- What future trends in the allied disciplines might significantly
impact project management?
- How would the allied disciplines' trends change project management?
- How would project managers have to change their mind-set because
of the allied disciplines' trends impact?
- How do we behave proactively to meet the challenges of trends
in the allied disciplines?

The Fifth Dimension
The fifth dimension is to tie Project management into Globalization.
Topics usually focus on areas communication, risk, standardization
and program management [5][6][7].

The Sixth Dimension
The sixth dimension is to escalate Project management from operation
to strategic and executive levels. Also this dimension emphasizes
the interaction among project management, strategic alignment, program/portfolio
management, organization structure and environment. [4][8][9][10]

The Seventh Dimension
The seventh dimension is to put more focus on external relations/diplomatic
perspective, such as "Understanding the Value of Project Management
From a Stakeholder's Perspective" [11]; Politics management and
conflict resolution [12]

The Eighth Dimension
The eighth dimension addresses advancing engineering and technology
into project management tools. There are too many examples for this.
Besides information technology, industrial and process engineering
discipline has been introduced to improve project management performance.
[12]
"Over the past several years, the trend has been to use every available
resource to complete projects on time and budget. This means more
partnering projects, both internally and externally. There is a
growing need for smaller companies to assist larger ones and take
on some of the engineering design work. Consequently, the project
work is getting more fragmented and distributed--and more challenging
to manage. To better deal with the growing complexity of project
work, many companies are investing in highly sophisticated design,
engineering and collaborative tools to obtain greater efficiency
from their valuable resources." [12]

Discussion and Conclusion
This literature review consolidates opinions from different authoritative
about the near future of project management research from 2008/2009.
In general, to identify new areas for research in project management
methodologically, we can
- Abstractize/organize current pieces in to a high level map.
Then we can identify holes that haven't been figured or do some
remapping of the whole system.
- Pull allied disciplines from traditional management, sociology,
history/culture/politics, science and technology.
- Expend the scope of project management knowledge to new industries
or higher organization levels.
Another effective (minimum cost to make maximum profit) approach
to identify new research topics can be a problem solving approach.
That is to identify problems/ current challenges, investigate the
root cause of the problem, and find the most appropriate solution
to solve them.
Reference
[1] Christophe N Bredillet (2008) Exploring Research in Project
Management: Nine Schools of Project Management Research (Part 6)
Project Management Journal. Sylva: Sep 2008. Vol. 39, Iss. 3; pg.
2, 4 pgs
[2] Lila Carden, Toby Egan. (2008) Does Our Literature Support
Sectors Newer to Project Management? The Search for Quality Publications
Relevant to Nontraditional Industries Project Management Journal.
Sylva: Sep 2008. Vol. 39, Iss. 3; pg. 6, 22 pgs
[3] Chung, Kon Shing Kenneth; Hossain, Liaquat. (2009) Measuring
performance of knowledge-intensive workgroups through social networks.
Project Management Journal, Jun2009, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p34-58, 25p,
3 charts, 5 diagrams, 1 graph; DOI: 10.1002/pmj.20115; (AN 41331847)
[4] Kwak, Young Hoon; Anbari, Frank T (2009) Availability-impact
analysis of project management trends: Perspectives from allied
disciplines. By:.. Project Management Journal, Jun2009, Vol. 40
Issue 2, p94-103, 10p, 7 charts, 1 graph; DOI: 10.1002/pmj.20111;
(AN 41331848)
[5] Levin, Dr. Ginger. (2009) Fundamentals of effective program
management: A process approach based on the global standard. Project
Management Journal, Jun2009, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p105-105, 1p, 1 bw;
DOI: 10.1002/pmj.20127; (AN 41331841)
[6] Ginger Levin. (2008) Global Project Management: Communication,
Collaboration and Management Across Borders Project Management Journal.
Sylva: Dec 2008. Vol. 39, Iss. 4; pg. 115, 1 pgs
[7] Greg Indelicato (2008) Project Management Journal. Sylva: Dec
2008. Vol. 39, Iss. 4; pg. 116, 1 pgs Managing Global Development
Risk by James M. Hussey and Steven E. Hall Auerbach Publications,
2008
[8] Ingason, Helgi Thor; Jónasson, Haukur Ingi. (2009) Contemporary
knowledge and skill requirements in project management Project Management
Journal, Jun2009, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p59-69, 11p, 2 charts, 7 diagrams;
DOI: 10.1002/pmj.20122; (AN 41331844)
[9] Cooke-Davies, T. J., et. al.,(2009) Project Management Systems:
Moving Project Management From an Operational to a Strategic Discipline.
Project Management Journal v. 40 no. 1 (March 2009) p. 110-23
[10] Mullaly, M., et. al. (2009), Exploring the Dynamics of Value
and Fit: Insights From Project Management. Project Management Journal
v. 40 no. 1 (March 2009) p. 124-35
[11] Zhai, L., et. al., (2009), Understanding the Value of Project
Management From a Stakeholder's Perspective: Case Study of Mega-Project
Management. Project Management Journal v. 40 no. 1 p. 99-109
[12] Gladden, R. (2009), Managing Politics and Conflict in Projects,
Project Management Journal v. 40 no. 1 (March 2009) p. 138
[13] Tom Fiske (2009) Process engineering tools drive efficiency
improvements Hydrocarbon Processing. Houston: Jun 2009.
The Author
Eric Tse is an international recognized expert/consultant in Enterprise
Access and Identity Management Architecture Design and Implementation.
He has been working with international renowned experts in information
technology in many prestigious companies. He also pursues research
interests in project management, financial models, application/enterprise/solution
architectures, compilation technology and philosophy of science.

To date,
18 people have rated this article. The average rating is
3.50 - Add your rating. Just select a rating and click the button.
No other information required.
Only one rating per person is allowed.
|
New Trends in Project Management
|

Return to the top
|